Ads by Google Ads by Google

Officers respond to an alleged disturbance in Leone village

TCF GATE
reporters@samoanews.com

Pago Pago, AMERICAN SAMOA — On March 18, 2026, local authorities responded to a reported domestic disturbance at a residence in the village of Leone.

Defendant Harry Moors was later arrested and charged with:

Count 1: Assault in the Third Degree (DV), a class D felony, a penalty enhancement by one class above the class otherwise provided (class A misdemeanor); and,

Count 2: Private Peace Disturbance (DV), a class B misdemeanor, a penalty enhancement by one class above the class otherwise provided (class C misdemeanor).

The defendant was held without bail.

According to the court affidavit, police were contacted by a concerned family member who reported that a verbal argument between his parents had escalated into a physical confrontation. The caller indicated that the situation inside the home had become increasingly intense, with loud shouting and signs of distress that raised immediate concern for the safety of those involved.

Responding officers were dispatched to the residence and arrived a short time later. Upon arrival, they were met by the reporting party, who appeared shaken and directed officers to the location of the defendant. Officers quickly secured the scene and made contact with the defendant, who was taken into custody without resistance and placed into a police unit for further processing.

Following the arrest, officers began interviewing individuals present at the residence to establish the sequence of events leading up to the incident.

According to statements provided, the altercation began earlier in the evening inside a bedroom, where the defendant and the victim were engaged in a conversation that eventually turned into a heated argument.

Witnesses reported that the argument grew progressively louder, with both parties raising their voices. At one point, shouting could be heard throughout the house, prompting concern from others nearby. The situation escalated further when cries were heard coming from the room, leading the reporting party to intervene and observe what was happening.

The court affidavit also stated that the individuals eventually moved outside the residence, where the argument continued. It was during this time that the defendant was observed pushing the victim and acting in a manner that suggested further physical violence was imminent. The reporting party indicated that the defendant appeared ready to strike the victim, which prompted the immediate call to police.

The victim later provided a detailed account of the incident, both verbally and in a written statement.

She explained that the argument began when the defendant brought up a disagreement that had occurred the previous night. The conversation quickly escalated when the defendant began making accusations regarding her alleged involvement with a neighbor. According to her statement, such accusations had been a recurring issue in their relationship and often led to arguments.

The victim further stated that she attempted to de-escalate the situation by asking the defendant to stop and expressing that she was tired of the repeated accusations.

However, her efforts were unsuccessful, as the defendant allegedly became more agitated and persistent. He reportedly urged her to accompany him outside, but she initially refused out of concern that the situation would worsen.

Moreover, the victim explained the defendant continued pressuring her until she eventually agreed to go outside in an effort to calm him down and avoid further escalation inside the home. Once outside, however, the argument resumed and intensified. The victim reported that the defendant pushed her and then grabbed her by the jaw, covering her mouth with his hand while applying pressure. She also stated that he pulled her by the arm during the confrontation.

The affidavit further noted that the victim feared the situation could escalate beyond control, particularly given the defendant’s aggressive behavior during the argument. She indicated that the ongoing nature of their disputes had created a tense and unstable living environment.

Investigators later confirmed that although the parties involved are no longer married, they continue to reside together in the same home, which is owned by the defendant.

Authorities noted that this shared living arrangement has contributed to ongoing conflict between the two, with frequent arguments reportedly occurring over time.

After being transported to the station, the defendant was Mirandized and acknowledged his rights and agreed to provide a statement to investigators.

During the interview, the defendant admitted that an argument had taken place and confirmed that it stemmed from his suspicions regarding the victim. He acknowledged that he pushed her, grabbed her jaw, and pulled her arm during the altercation. The defendant also reportedly stated that the ongoing disputes between them would likely continue if the current living arrangement remained unchanged, suggesting that he wanted the victim to move out of the residence.

Based on the statements collected and the evidence gathered during the investigation, officers determined that there was sufficient cause to proceed with the case.

The defendant was formally booked in the early morning hours of March 19, 2026, at approximately 12:40 a.m., and was transported to the Tafuna Correctional Facility.

He remains confined pending the next available sitting of the District Court as the case continues to move through the judicial process.

The defendant is identified as a 46-year-old citizen of Samoa.

The affidavit was filed in the District Court on March 20, 2026.

[Editor’s Note: An affidavit is a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation for use as evidence in court. It is not a court decision. Under local law, defendants are considered innocent until proven guilty by the court.]